#Inkscape vs gimp scientific journals software

We noticed how much time and energy author-supplied image correction was taking up in their workflow, and after a thorough analysis came up with PACE (Picture Analysis & Conversion Engine). New approach for streamlining image-correction: PACEĪpex was inspired to look at a better way to handle images when working on a larger workflow modernization project with Public Library of Science (PLOS). How are author-supplied image issues currently

There is an expense, a time delay, and often the need to go back to the author regardless. In another poll during our webinar, outsourcing to a vendor partner was the third most-used option for addressing image correction, but tends to have the same challenges as in-house staff revisions. In instances where the original file is unusable, even for in-house designers (poor resolution, too small, etc.), publishers still have to go back to the author and request a resupply, opening up the challenges addressed in option one above. While having in-house staff revise graphics results in a higher-quality output, this strategy still requires additional publisher resources and adds time to the publication schedule. For untrained users, it can be difficult to manipulate these systems to deliver the exact specifications publishers are looking for.

#Inkscape vs gimp scientific journals software

If you’ve ever used photo editing software like Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator or open source options like GIMP and Inkscape, you know it requires a certain level of skill and training to utilize them correctly. This method doesn’t always result in a good replacement image and can lead to additional revision cycles before a publication-ready file is approved. There are three approaches that most publishers use today to fix graphics – all of which include some kind of expense, time delay, and additional author approvals: 1. Are author-supplied images a challenge in your workflow? Almost 60% answered ‘yes’, with another 39% seeking more efficient options. In a recent webinar, we asked attendees (largely journal publishers, university presses, and trade publishers) if author-supplied images were a challenge in their workflows. Generally speaking, authors are not graphics experts, and manuscript submission guidelines can be detailed and complex. It’s a common workflow issue, but not commonly talked about – image correction.įor publishers of all types, but particularly scholarly journals, obtaining high-quality graphics from authors that are perfectly formatted for publication at first submission is not the standard.